Commingling: Overview, definition, and example

What is commingling?

Commingling refers to the mixing or blending of funds, assets, or property that are meant to be kept separate. In a financial or legal context, commingling occurs when an individual or entity combines their personal or business assets with those of another party in a way that violates legal or contractual requirements to keep the assets distinct. This can apply to both physical and digital assets, such as money, securities, or property, and can occur in areas like bank accounts, trusts, real estate, and business finances.

Commingling is generally considered problematic because it complicates ownership or accountability, especially when the assets belong to different parties or are governed by different legal terms. It can create confusion over who owns what, complicate financial audits, and lead to legal or tax complications.

Why is commingling important?

Commingling is important because it can have serious legal and financial consequences. In many cases, laws or regulations require that certain assets or funds remain separate for purposes such as tax compliance, contractual obligations, or trust management. Commingling assets can result in breach of trust, fraud, or mismanagement, and may result in financial losses or legal disputes.

For businesses, avoiding commingling helps maintain clear financial records, ensures compliance with regulatory standards, and provides protection against potential claims from creditors or investors. For individuals, particularly those acting as trustees, avoiding commingling is crucial to ensuring the fiduciary responsibility is upheld and that assets are managed correctly for the benefit of beneficiaries.

Understanding commingling through an example

A business owner has a separate business bank account to manage company funds. However, the owner also uses this account for personal expenses, such as paying for personal groceries or household bills. This is an example of commingling, as the business and personal funds are being mixed in a way that violates standard business practices and legal requirements.

In another example, a trustee is responsible for managing a trust’s assets for the benefit of the beneficiaries. However, the trustee decides to use the trust’s funds to cover their personal expenses or mix them with their own money. This is an instance of commingling because the trustee is not keeping the assets separate, which can lead to legal consequences and breach of fiduciary duty.

An example of commingling clause

Here’s how a clause addressing commingling might appear in a contract, trust agreement, or business policy:

“The Trustee agrees not to commingle the Trust’s funds or assets with their personal assets or any other funds not belonging to the Trust. The Trustee will ensure that all assets are kept separate and distinct, in accordance with the legal obligations and fiduciary duties imposed by this Agreement.”

Conclusion

Commingling refers to the mixing of assets that should remain separate, creating potential legal, financial, and ethical issues. Whether in business finances, personal transactions, or trust management, commingling can lead to a loss of transparency, accountability, and legal compliance. To avoid complications, it is essential to maintain proper separation of funds and assets according to regulatory standards or the specific terms of agreements. Understanding and preventing commingling helps safeguard individuals and organizations from potential legal and financial risks.


This article contains general legal information and does not contain legal advice. Cobrief is not a law firm or a substitute for an attorney or law firm. The law is complex and changes often. For legal advice, please ask a lawyer.