Lost, stolen, or mutilated warrant: Overview, definition, and example

What is a lost, stolen, or mutilated warrant?

A lost, stolen, or mutilated warrant refers to a situation where a warrant—typically a document or certificate representing a right to buy or sell shares of stock or another security—has been misplaced, taken unlawfully, or damaged to the point that it is no longer recognizable or usable. A warrant is a type of security that gives the holder the right to purchase a company’s stock at a specific price within a set period. If this document is lost, stolen, or mutilated, the holder may not be able to exercise the warrant until the situation is resolved, usually by requesting a replacement or making a legal claim.

For example, a shareholder who has lost a stock warrant may apply to the issuing company for a replacement warrant under the terms outlined in the agreement.

Why is a lost, stolen, or mutilated warrant important?

The issue of lost, stolen, or mutilated warrants is important because it addresses situations where a holder cannot exercise their rights under the warrant due to the document being damaged or missing. These scenarios can be problematic, particularly if the warrant is linked to valuable financial rights, such as the ability to purchase stock at a favorable price. Ensuring there is a clear process for addressing lost, stolen, or mutilated warrants protects both the issuer and the holder by providing a mechanism to resolve the issue while maintaining security and compliance.

For businesses or companies issuing warrants, it is important to have procedures in place to prevent fraud or misuse of stolen or lost warrants, while also offering a fair process for legitimate cases of loss or damage. For holders, understanding the process for dealing with lost, stolen, or mutilated warrants ensures that they can still claim their rights and receive a replacement if necessary.

Understanding lost, stolen, or mutilated warrants through an example

Imagine an investor who holds a warrant that allows them to purchase 1,000 shares of a company at $10 per share. If the investor loses the physical warrant or it is stolen, they may no longer have a way to prove their right to exercise the warrant. In such a case, the investor would need to contact the company or issuer to request a replacement warrant, often providing proof of identity and any necessary documentation to demonstrate the loss. The company may then issue a new warrant in place of the lost or stolen one, following the procedures outlined in the warrant agreement.

In another example, if a warrant becomes mutilated—perhaps through physical damage such as water or fire damage—the holder would again need to apply for a replacement warrant. The company would typically request that the damaged warrant be submitted for verification and issue a new one if appropriate.

An example of a lost, stolen, or mutilated warrant clause

Here’s how a lost, stolen, or mutilated warrant clause might appear in a warrant agreement:

“If a Warrant is lost, stolen, or mutilated, the Holder may request a replacement from the Issuer by providing satisfactory proof of the loss, theft, or damage. Upon receipt of such proof and compliance with any necessary verification procedures, the Issuer shall issue a new Warrant in place of the lost, stolen, or mutilated Warrant. The Holder agrees to indemnify the Issuer against any claims or damages resulting from the issuance of the replacement Warrant.”

Conclusion

A lost, stolen, or mutilated warrant can create complications for holders who are trying to exercise their rights under the warrant. It is essential to have clear procedures for addressing such issues, ensuring that holders can obtain replacement warrants when necessary, while also protecting against fraud or misuse. By understanding the process for dealing with lost, stolen, or damaged warrants, both the issuer and holder can ensure that the rights and obligations attached to the warrant are upheld.


This article contains general legal information and does not contain legal advice. Cobrief is not a law firm or a substitute for an attorney or law firm. The law is complex and changes often. For legal advice, please ask a lawyer.