Introduction

In graphic design, protecting creativity is just as important as producing it. That’s where a graphic design intellectual property agreement comes in. It’s more than just a legal formality—it’s a way for both designers and clients to set clear expectations and protect their interests. This document outlines who gets to own the final work, and what can be done with it.

But what should a graphic design intellectual property agreement include? Let’s dive in.

Read: What does time is of the essence mean in a business contract?

What is a graphic design intellectual property agreement?

A graphic design intellectual property agreement is a roadmap for the relationship between a designer and a client. It spells out who gets to own and control the designs, what the client is allowed to do with them, and whether the designer can flaunt their work in their portfolio or on social media. Think of it as the fine print that makes sure everyone’s on the same page before the first sketch hits the screen.

Without it, things can get messy fast. Imagine a graphic designer spending hours perfecting a logo only to find out the client is using it on products they never agreed to—or worse, selling it to someone else. This agreement protects the designer’s rights, ensuring they don’t lose control over their own work. For clients, it sets clear boundaries about what they can do with the designs they’ve paid for, like using them for marketing, creating merchandise, or tweaking them down the road.

What should a graphic design intellectual property agreement include?

Here’s a breakdown of the essential elements to include, so both the graphic designer and the client know where they stand.

Background intellectual property rights and foregoing intellectual property rights

Background intellectual property rights refer to anything the designer created before starting the current project. Think of this as their personal library of creative assets, like pre-existing fonts, illustrations, or templates. Even if some of these assets are used in the new project, the designer still owns them—they're not handing over the rights to everything in their toolkit just because they're using it for the job.

Foreground intellectual property rights cover the new creations that come from this specific collaboration, like a custom logo or unique graphics made for the client. This is where ownership needs to be clearly defined in the agreement. Will the client fully own these new works, or will the designer retain ownership and grant the client permission to use them?

Ownership rights

This is at the heart of the agreement. Ownership rights clear up who owns the final work once they’re designed. Is it the client or is it the designer? Clear ownership rights prevent future disputes and help everyone know who gets to take the creative credit.

There are three main ways to set the ownership rights.

The first option is that once the project wraps up and payment is made, the client owns the design lock, stock, and barrel. This is the cleanest option. They can use it however they want—slap it on products, modify it, or even put it on a billboard in Times Square. The designer can’t reuse or resell the design elsewhere, but they may still get to show it off in their portfolio if the agreement allows.

The second option is that the designer owns it but licenses the final work to the client for free, usually with certain limitations. For example, the client might get to use the design on their website and social media but would need further permission (and perhaps pay extra) to use it on merchandise or for a different purpose. This option works well for designers who want to protect their creative rights but still give the client what they need.

The final option is joint ownership of the intellectual property rights in the final work. This scenario is a bit like co-parenting the design, which can get complicated. Both parties have equal rights to use and modify the design, which sounds fair in theory but often leads to confusion or disputes. If, say, the client wants to tweak the design for a new campaign, they might have to get the designer’s approval—or vice versa. This arrangement is typically better suited for R&D projects where both parties are contributing to the development of something new and innovative. For most graphic design work, it’s best to avoid this option unless both sides are fully prepared to navigate the headaches and complications.

Scope of use

Here’s where the rubber meets the road. This section spells out exactly how the client can use the designs, so there are no surprises later on. Can they plaster the logo you created all over town on billboards, or are they only allowed to use it on their website and social media? What about merchandise—can they print it on t-shirts and mugs, or is that a no-go?

Defining the scope of use is all about setting boundaries. It’s like giving someone the keys to your car—you want to make sure they’re just taking it for a spin around the block and not on a cross-country road trip. By clearly outlining where, how, and for what purpose the designs can be used, both parties know exactly what’s allowed and what’s off-limits.

Deliverables

This part is all about defining what the designer is handing over. Is it just a snazzy new logo? Maybe a full set of branding materials? Or perhaps an entire website design? Whatever it is, it needs to be spelled out clearly in the agreement. That way, everyone knows what to expect and there’s no confusion about what’s included.

Unlike a services agreement, an intellectual property agreement focuses on the actual design assets themselves, not timelines or project milestones. So, while you won’t find details like delivery dates here, you will see a thorough list of what’s being created and what form those deliverables will take—be it digital files, printed materials, or something else entirely. The idea is to make sure both parties are on the same page about what the final handoff will look like.

Indemnity clause

An indemnity clause is like insurance for both parties involved in the agreement, protecting them from potential legal trouble down the road. Essentially, it outlines who will cover the costs if someone gets sued or suffers damages because of how the final design work is used.

For example, let’s say a graphic designer creates a logo for a client, but the logo ends up looking a little too similar to another company’s trademarked design. If this other company decides to sue for trademark infringement, the indemnity clause would determine who’s responsible for covering the legal fees and any potential damages. Without a clear indemnity clause, both the client and the designer could end up pointing fingers at each other over who should pay the costs and legal bills, turning a manageable dispute into a chaotic mess.

Attribution

If the designer wants to receive credit for their work, this section should outline how attribution will be given. Will the designer's name appear on the website, packaging, or marketing materials that feature their work? Or will they get a shoutout in the project credits, or a discreet “designed by” mention somewhere?

Including specific attribution requirements helps to showcase the designer's portfolio and build their professional reputation. It’s more than just a pat on the back—it’s about professional acknowledgment that can lead to new opportunities. Whether the design ends up on a billboard or the back of a cereal box, knowing their name is attached to their creation can be a significant boost for the designer’s brand and career.

Rights to include the work in the graphic designer’s portfolio

Finally, this section should specify whether the designer has the right to showcase the completed work in their portfolio. It’s a valuable marketing tool for graphic designers, as showcasing previous projects can attract new clients. Clients might be open to this, but it’s important to get it in writing to avoid any awkward conversations later.

By including these elements in a graphic design intellectual property agreement, both the designer and the client can enjoy a smoother collaboration, paving the way for creative success without stepping on each other’s toes.

Read: What is a termination fee?

What’s the difference between a services agreement and a graphic design intellectual property agreement?

When it comes to graphic design work, it’s common to see both a services agreement (sometimes called a master services agreement) and a graphic design intellectual property agreement. While they might seem similar, they serve different purposes.

A services agreement is a broader document that outlines the overall terms of the services being provided. This could include everything from timelines and payment terms to the specific deliverables expected from the designer. Essentially, it’s the playbook for the entire project, detailing what the designer will do, how they’ll do it, and when it will be completed.

On the other hand, a graphic design intellectual property agreement zooms in on the ownership and usage rights of the creative work produced during that collaboration. This agreement is all about protecting the designer’s creative assets and ensuring clarity on intellectual property matters.

In short, while a services agreement covers the "how" and "when" of the work being done, a graphic design intellectual property agreement focuses on the "who owns what." Having both agreements in place can help ensure that the creative process runs smoothly and that all parties involved understand their roles and rights.

Read: How to review a statement of work like a pro

Conclusion

A well-crafted graphic design intellectual property agreement is essential for a harmonious designer-client relationship. It lays the groundwork for how the designs can be used, who holds the rights, and what both parties can expect from each other. By covering all these bases upfront, designers and clients can focus on what really matters: creating amazing work without the worry of ownership disputes or miscommunications. It’s the key to a creative partnership that works for everyone involved.

How Cobrief can help with contract review

Reading your business contracts can feel overwhelming as an owner-manager of a small to medium-sized business. That’s where Cobrief comes in. Cobrief helps business owners and operators review their business-to-business contracts for legal risks.

Upload your contract to Cobrief's AI contract review software, click review and you’ll get a list of all the risks, in plain English. This helps you decide whether to sign, negotiate or reject the terms of your contract, or hire a lawyer. Think of it as a heat map for your contracts.

Get started here.